重大突破!VAR将新增角球和第二黄牌复核权限,2026世界杯率先试点(重磅升级:VAR将获角球与第二黄牌复核权,2026年世界杯率先试点)
发布时间:2026-01-19

Considering VAR updates

secon

I see the user has shared a Chinese headline about a major breakthrough in VAR rules for corner kicks and second yellow cards starting with the 2026 World Cup. They might be looking for a summary or commentary. I think I should be concise and friendly, maybe asking if they want a summary or specific details.

I'll quickly analyze what VAR currently covers and the implications of these changes, including potential pros and cons, implementation challenges, and the need for clear thresholds.Verifying VAR claims

There's some discussion about adding corner kick reviews and the ability to review second yellow cards in VAR, but I'm unsure if that's factual. As of October 2024, IFAB had only allowed VAR reviews for specific categories like goals, penalties, direct red cards, and mistaken identity. Corners and second yellows aren't reviewable under current rules.

It’s crucial to clarify that I can’t verify new information past my cutoff date. I should ask if the user wants me to verify claims and offer an analysis of the implications if these changes were true.Considering VAR implications

I want to explore the potential impacts of adding corner kick and second yellow card reviews on game flow, controversies, coaching strategies, and disciplinary records. I could also consider the risk of simulation regarding second yellow cards. While there might be network options available, I should avoid using them unless necessary.

I can offer quick takeaways and examples, like how corner kick reviews would work—like checking if the last touch was by a defender or whether the ball crossed the line. There are also questions about the threshold for second yellow reviews and whether teams might exploit these changes. Additionally, I'd consider the difference between on-field reviews versus factual checks in soccer's VAR context.Outlining VAR pilot timeline and questions

think

The timeline for the 2026 World Cup pilot suggests that IFAB may approve trials in 2025-2026, allowing FIFA-run tournaments to test these changes. I could propose questions to consider, like exact protocol definitions, the difference between check-only and on-field reviews, potential benefits for attackers, time limits, and coach challenges. There was also speculation on a "cricket-style review" and a possible captain's challenge trial in FIFA's youth tournament, though I’m not entirely sure about past trials.

I should keep my response concise and offer six bullet points: what's new, why it matters, how it might work, benefits, risks, and what to watch for. Additionally, I can ask if they'd like a graphic or source verification while maintaining a neutral tone.

有意思的爆料!我目前无法实时核验这条消息的权威来源;要不要我帮你查证?先给你一个“如果属实”的专业解读,方便你快速把握影响点:

  • 核心变化

    • 角球复核:可回看判定是否应判角球/球门球,或球是否已整体出界。
    • 第二黄牌复核:现行VAR不介入第二黄;若放开,将成为第五类可复核事项。
  • 为何重要

    • 角球往往直接带来进球机会;误判影响大,但目前不可单独复核。
    • 第二黄常决定生死(变相红牌);历史争议多,却长期不在VAR权限内。
  • 可能怎么执行

    • 角球:以“事实性”检查为主(最后触球、是否出界),多为半自动/影像快速判定。
    • 第二黄:应采“清晰且明显错误”门槛+场边回看;不太可能开放边际动作的无限复盘。
  • 预期收益

    ories

    • 降低定位球来源的关键误判;终场前角球/门球换判带来的不公减少。
    • 大赛中因“软黄”引发的早早少打一类不公,可能得到纠偏。
  • 风险与挑战

    FIFA

    • 比赛流畅度:角球频繁,如何避免过多打断?可能采用“仅在进球前的角球来源”“最后5分钟+关键球”等限定。
    • 尺度统一:第二黄主观性强,联赛/国际赛口径需强一致培训与指引。
    • 战术博弈:球队可能利用复核窗口“拖节奏”,需严控触发条件与时长。
  • 观察点(若2026世界杯试点)

    • 触发范围:是全面覆盖,还是限定“导致进球/点球/红牌的前序角球”才复核?
    • 门槛表述:是否写入《比赛规则》为“清晰且明显错误”,以及是否包含“数量/时间限制”。
    • 技术配套:门线/半自动越位式的多机位与出界检测是否同步升级,以缩短判定时间。

需要我帮你核对官方公告或权威媒体报道,并在确认后给你一版对球迷/解说易用的规则速查图吗?